patrimonio]]> política]]> legislación]]> heritage]]> politics]]> legislation]]> While the national state does not assume the responsibilities established by the National Constitution regarding heritage preservation, concern for heritage and the adoption of related policies have moved beyond the national scale and are now discussed at the macroregional level, such as MERCOSUR, and at the international level.
At the same time, municipalities and local residents are becoming increasingly involved in the preservation of local heritage, while Indigenous communities are claiming participation in the management of their cultural assets, particularly the human remains of their ancestors.
Local and supranational heritage management, Indigenous claims, mass consumption of archaeological resources, and the privatization of the management of cultural resources are issues that, until recently, had been largely ignored in Argentina. Today, however, they challenge the very foundations of heritage protection.
In this context, the aim of this paper is to analyze the new scenario of heritage preservation in Argentina and to explore the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, as well as the opportunities and threats that this new reality may generate.]]> Mientras el Estado nacional no asume las responsabilidades que establece la Constitución Nacional en materia de preservación del patrimonio, la preocupación por el mismo y la adopción de políticas trasciende la escala nacional y se discute a nivel macroregional (MERCOSUR) e internacional.
A su vez, municipios y vecinos se involucran de manera creciente en la preservación del patrimonio local, al tiempo que comunidades indígenas reclaman participación en la gestión de sus bienes culturales, en particular los restos humanos de sus antepasados.
Gestión local y supranacional del patrimonio, reclamos indígenas, consumo masivo de recursos arqueológicos y privatización del manejo de los recursos culturales, cuestiones hasta hace poco ignoradas en Argentina, desafían ahora los fundamentos mismos de la protección del patrimonio.
En este sentido, el propósito de este artículo es analizar el nuevo escenario de la preservación del patrimonio en Argentina y explorar las fortalezas y debilidades del sistema actual, así como las oportunidades y amenazas que esta nueva realidad puede originar.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2002-05-30]]> application/pdf]]> patrimonio]]> legislación Salta]]> heritage]]> Salta legislation]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2002-05-30]]> application/pdf]]> patrimonio]]> legislación]]> Jujuy]]> heritage]]> legislation]]> Jujuy]]> Since its sanction and promulgation, this law has gone through different stages in terms of its application. These stages have been shaped by the political and economic possibilities of the province to put into practice what the law establishes and, ultimately, by the “concern or awareness” of the officials of each government, who have emphasized certain aspects of it.
The “changes” produced in the way the law has been applied have often led to “partial or total” compliance, under different circumstances, by those who are related to archaeological heritage to varying degrees, including politicians, researchers, local inhabitants, and others. This situation raises the question: if nothing was done before, what is being sought now?
In this paper, we attempt to approach the current “reality” of the validity and application of this law in the province of Jujuy.]]> Desde su sanción y promulgación, la mencionada ley pasó por distintos momentos en cuanto a su aplicación. Los cuales estuvieron marcados por las posibilidades políticas y económicas de la provincia de llevar a la práctica lo enunciado por dicha ley y, en última instancia, por la “preocupación o conciencia” de funcionarios de cada uno de esos gobiernos que ponen énfasis en determinados aspectos de la misma.
Los “cambios” producidos en su forma de aplicarla llevaron en numerosas ocasiones a cumplimientos “parciales o totales”, en diversas circunstancias, por quienes están en distinto grado relacionados al patrimonio arqueológico (políticos, investigadores, pobladores, etc.): ¿Si antes no hacían nada... ahora qué quieren?
En el presente trabajo intentamos acercarnos a la “realidad” de la vigencia y aplicación actual de la mencionada ley en la provincia de Jujuy.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2002-05-30]]> application/pdf]]> patrimonio]]> universidad]]> heritage]]> university]]> On the other hand, efforts must be joined in order to safeguard regional heritage. Everyone’s voice must be heard, academic silences must come to an end, and permanent dialogue must be sought.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2002-05-30]]> application/pdf]]> patrimonio]]> valores culturales]]> heritage]]> cultural value]]> These new ideas gradually shaped a new “global political concept”, which was not assumed in the same way by the different countries and regions that make up the international community and even less so by the promoters of change.
Our starting point is a reflection on the factors that have led, in the last decade, to a renewed treatment of issues related to the importance of developing cultural policies and defending cultural heritage.
On the basis of ideas from several Latin American authors and recent official documents that we consider important, we analyze and attempt to ground our own practice in relation to the promotion of cultural values, seeking to answer the questions of how and for what purpose—or for whom—we construct our proposals.]]> Nuestro punto de partida es la reflexión sobre los factores que han hecho resurgir el tratamiento de temas relacionados con la importancia de la elaboración de políticas culturales y la defensa del patrimonio cultural en el último decenio.
Sobre la base de las ideas de algunos autores latinoamericanos y de algunos documentos oficiales recientes que consideramos importantes, analizamos e intentamos fundamentar nuestra propia práctica en relación con el tratamiento de la promoción de los valores culturales, tratando de responder a las preguntas del cómo y el para qué, o para quiénes, construimos nuestras propuestas.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2002-05-30]]> application/pdf]]> desaparecidos]]> dictadura militar argentina]]> prensa argentina]]> identidad discursiva]]> discurso autoritario]]> derechos humanos]]> disappeared persons]]> Argentine military dictatorship]]> Argentine press]]> discursive identity]]> authoritarian discourse]]> human rights]]> This situation also involved the ordinary reader, the citizen, who had a direct and non-mediated experience of the events. This struggle over the definition and content of a word, and over the identity of an unprecedented social actor in national history, violently put into crisis the forms of enunciation and the modeling of informational discourse.
In short, the case of the disappeared is configured as a true “discursive device” because it is closely linked to military power, to the power of the media as operators of visibility, and to the power of the relatives to reject, deny, and finally transform the prevailing regime of enunciation.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> espacio museístico]]> semiótica del espacio]]> museos de Bellas Artes]]> tipología museística]]> recorrido del visitante]]> manipulación semiótica]]> museum space]]> semiotics of space]]> art museums]]> museum typology]]> visitor path]]> semiotic manipulation]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> diccionario arqueológico]]> análisis lítico]]> terminología arqueológica]]> análisis del discurso]]> redes semánticas]]> semiótica]]> archaeological dictionary]]> lithic analysis]]> archaeological terminology]]> discourse analysis]]> semantic networks]]> semiotics]]> Here I present the elements needed to navigate the Diccionario de uso para el análisis lítico, developed from a corpus of Latin American archaeological texts and available at www.winchkler.com.ar. I list the criteria followed in each stage of the work: delimitation of the corpus, segmentation of the texts, organization of the segmented fragments into different definitions, selection of terms, alphabetical lists, construction of networks, and preparation of entries.
I also present the elements resulting from this process: the corpus, the statements, the definitions, the networks, and the entries. Finally, I offer some comments on the most complex aspects of the research.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> Charles S. Peirce]]> semiótica literaria]]> texto literario]]> interpretante]]> semiosis ilimitada]]> literariedad]]> Charles S. Peirce]]> literary semiotics]]> literary text]]> interpretant]]> unlimited semiosis]]> literariness]]> The paper also explores the explanatory and descriptive capacity of these categories in relation to the literary text, understood as a complex and stratified unit of meaning in which all its elements, from an interpretive vocation, achieve a certain articulation.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> cuerpo femenino]]> publicidad gráfica]]> prensa argentina]]> semiotización]]> ropa interior]]> representación corporal]]> female body]]> print advertising]]> Argentine press]]> semiotization]]> underwear]]> body representation]]> In this examination, as in the study of the previous period, an attempt is made to establish connections with other media domains, especially with regard to the technical procedures of image production and the organization of scenes. These elements function as articulators of processes of semiotization that give rise to the construction of a certain body.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> semiótica]]> estudios culturales]]> producción de sentido]]> medios de comunicación]]> transdisciplinariedad]]> análisis textual]]> semiotics]]> cultural studies]]> meaning production]]> mass media]]> transdisciplinarity]]> textual analysis]]> Other points of convergence may be proposed if it is accepted that semiotic inquiry focuses on the effects and devices of meaning production, whereas cultural studies seeks to uncover the social relations articulated with them. The enterprise is never the same, but in both cases it must begin by recognizing the inevitable novelty and opacity of its objects, as well as their disorganizing impact on reading canons which, by virtue of their permanence, cannot account for the mobility of the semiotic network.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> ritual andino]]> Pachamama]]> tejidos rituales]]> dualismo dialéctico]]> complementariedad de género]]> cosmovisión andina]]> Andean ritual]]> Pachamama]]> ritual textiles]]> dialectical dualism]]> gender complementarity]]> Andean worldview]]> This model is found throughout the social, political, economic, cosmological, and aesthetic culture of the Runakuna, as exemplified in qhari-warmi relations, the living landscape, and the woven bundles that derive from pre-Columbian funerary bundles.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> imaginarios urbanos]]> estética urbana]]> rituales urbanos]]> cultura urbana]]> espacio público]]> América Latina]]> urban imaginaries]]> urban aesthetics]]> urban rituals]]> urban culture]]> public space]]> Latin America]]> Seen from this perspective, cities reveal citizen forms of expressiveness that take shape in certain everyday rituals, such as the street rounds of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, the television “fachas” on Peruvian television, dance halls in Mexico, and even the media terror of the Medellín Cartel. All these cases are presented as arguments in progress for characterizing a complex and dissimilar urban aesthetics of the Americas.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> semiótica peirceana]]> teoría de la comunicación]]> semiosis]]> relación triádica]]> signo]]> interpretante]]> Peircean semiotics]]> communication theory]]> semiosis]]> triadic relation]]> sign]]> interpretant]]> In other words, the notion of sign corresponds to the less abstract notion of message; the object corresponds to the notion of sender; and the interpretant derives from the receiver. Some implications of this thesis are discussed.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]> discurso periodístico]]> sujeto discursivo]]> periodismo televisivo]]> ciudadanía]]> modalidades de enunciación]]> análisis del discurso]]> journalistic discourse]]> discursive subject]]> television journalism]]> citizenship]]> enunciative modalities]]> discourse analysis]]> Journalistic discourse accounts for the practices of the producing subject, the journalist, as well as for the objects, concepts, and strategies that circulate within it. On the basis of the modalities of enunciation of televised journalistic discursive formation on socio-political issues, it is possible to establish the position occupied by the subject, which is expressed in the set of utterances and strategies deployed.
The function of the subject of the utterance, as an empty and shifting function from one utterance to another, may be performed by individuals who are different to a certain extent or by a single individual who may successively occupy different positions within a group of utterances and assume the role of different subjects. This paper seeks to establish the relationship between journalist and citizen.]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu]]> 2001-11-30]]> application/pdf]]>